While the Activity is Typically Low

The court was unable to find any basis for QT Inc.’s claims related to traditional Chinese medicine, concluding that it was “part of a scheme devised by QT Inc to defraud its consumers”. Ionized jewelry such as Q-Ray has been heavily criticized based on multiple factors. 59.95-$349.95 (CAD) per bracelet. There are currently 35 different available Q-Ray models on their website, including their Deluxe Series, Titanium Series, bangkok condo for rent and other Special Edition bracelets. The company also recommends users to replace their Q-Ray every two years. Many customer reviews have described themselves as repeat customers ordering multiple bracelets over time.

Alternative health bracelets such as ionized jewelry are currently characterized as pseudoscience. No currently available research from third parties have verified their claims. No scientific research supporting these claims are referenced anywhere on their website or store. Q-Ray’s theory is grounded in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) and pose similar benefits to acupuncture, another practice designed to balance the flow of qi and controversial in scientific communities in regard to its efficacy. Instead, they advertise and rely heavily on testimonials as anecdotal evidence. Their website claims to optimize your natural positive energy and restore balance. A number of wearable products marketed as “negative ion generators” have actually been found to contain radioactive thorium or uranium, apparently to generate negative ions as a result of radioactive decay.

In 1994, Andrew Park bought a Bio-Ray bracelet while visiting Barcelona, Spain. During this time many marketing claims were made regarding the product’s alleged effectiveness, most notably regarding relief from pain and arthritis due to manipulation of a body’s chi. In a Marketplace interview, Charles Park, president of Q-Ray Canada, explains that the term “ionized” does not mean the bracelets themselves are ionized, but rather that the term comes from their secret “ionization process” which, he asserts, affects the bracelets in undisclosed ways.

While the activity is typically low, adverse affects from cumulative exposure to the radioactivity in these products cannot be ruled out. A placebo controlled randomized trial study published in the journal Mayo Clinic Proceedings compared the effect of ionized bracelet produced by Q-ray to an identically appearing placebo bracelet. The study found no difference between the ionized bracelet and control with respect to musculoskeletal pain, suggesting the effects of Q-ray bracelet was due to the placebo effect. Court rules in FTC’s favor in Q-Ray bracelet case Archived August 25, 2009, at the Wayback Machine U.S.

FTC halts deceptive pain relief claims. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 77 (11): 1164-8. doi:10.4065/77.11.1164. This page was last edited on 30 August 2022, at 03:35 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 3.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Holahan, Vince (28 July 2014). “”Negative Ion” Technology-What You Should Know”. Bratton, RL; Montero, DP; Adams, KS; Novas, MA; McKay, TC; Hall, LJ; Foust, JG; Mueller, MB; O’Brien, PC; Atkinson, EJ; Maurer, MS (Nov 2002). “Effect of “ionized” wrist bracelets on musculoskeletal pain: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial”.